Tag Archives: Philosophy

Fear and Control

History is something not many people study or try to learn from—whether from our past mistakes or successes. We often think that what is happening now around the world is unprecedented, that we are on the brink of the end. But it has always been like this, ever since humans began thinking beyond their basic needs: food, shelter, sleep, and reproduction.

We constantly fear that our little space in the world will be disrupted, our comfort taken away, and our way of life destroyed. That’s when the clever man steps in—the one who looks for cracks in our emotions to control and exploit us. Kings are master manipulators, ruling over those who need direction or who, driven by self-interest, seek to achieve common goals—usually benefiting greatly by bending the knee.

Our primal emotion, fear, is the ruler of our thoughts. It corrupts our feelings, generates dark ideas, and can even paralyze us. A person without fear is often labeled a psychopath—someone who walks among us without empathy or remorse. The perfect king is a noble psychopath: charming and manipulative, seducing others into war in the name of something—something we all desire: money, property, or heavenly redemption.

Sitting around a table with their minds in overdrive, these rulers realized that keeping people afraid is the most effective way to govern.

Over time, we all learned from our kings. Those without remorse—greedy, vain, envious, and ruthless—have developed efficient and effective ways to manipulate others for their own gain, with fear as their secret weapon.

Our last global crisis, in 2019, proved that when we are all afraid at once, we become easy to manipulate. We willingly gave up our liberties without a second thought. We became a scared herd, led not by leaders, but by fear itself.

It is a fact that before this crisis, the world was in a state of protest against the status quo. In Asia, people were demanding more freedom; in America, civil rights movements surged; in Europe, citizens were calling for transparency and an end to state corruption. The younger generation was fearless, and for a moment, it seemed like something in the global power structure might crack.

Then came the perfect excuse to stop the avalanche of change—a disease, something invisible that could kill us all. We were told to socially distance, stay indoors, avoid questioning authority, and accept a new system of control. For three years, the world was gripped by constant stress: daily death counts, cries of “fake news,” and growing political division.

As time passed, we realized it was indeed a lethal disease—but also a conveniently timed one. It cooled the streets and allowed the ruling powers to reset the machinery that had, for a moment, stopped shielding them from the people.

It was a highly convenient problem—something that killed millions and terrified millions more.

Social media played a crucial role in helping the kings control the narrative. It became a filter of what could be said publicly. A tight algorithm would ban you if you challenged the measures they claimed were keeping us “safe.”

This might sound like a hate song against ruling parties, but it’s undeniable: they have used fear to control us—our markets, our education systems, our social media, our wars—and most dangerously, to become the sole owners of truth.

Control is necessary in society—but not when it’s used against us. Do you remember the parties held in London during the lockdowns? The rulers of England were drinking and hugging while, on TV, they were telling everyone else to keep their distance.

In the end, we must understand that fear controls everything we do. Turn off the alarms. Read between the lines. Keep an open mind. And remember: we are all mortal—but the world will keep turning around the Sun until we find another place to call home.

Don’t fear—think.

Don’t fear—learn.

Don’t fear—remember.

Don’t fear—open your eyes.

Are We Living in a Simulation?

Exploring the Science, Math, and Spiritual Echoes of the Simulation Hypothesis

Are We Living in a Simulation?

Exploring the Science, Math, and Spiritual Echoes of the Simulation Hypothesis

What if everything you know — your thoughts, your memories, your sense of time and space — is just code? It might sound like science fiction, but there is a serious philosophical and mathematical theory behind the idea that we could be living inside a computer simulation.

This is known as the Simulation Hypothesis.

Where Did This Idea Come From?

In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom proposed a thought-provoking argument:

One of the following must be true:

Civilizations go extinct before developing the ability to simulate reality. They develop the technology but lose interest in using it. We are almost certainly living in a simulation.

If the first two are unlikely, then the third becomes statistically more probable.

The Mathematical and Scientific Foundations

1. Bayesian Probability

Bostrom’s logic relies on probability: if simulated beings vastly outnumber real ones, then statistically, we’re more likely to be among the simulated.

2. The Universe as Code

Several areas of science support this possibility:

Cellular automata: Simple mathematical rules generate complex patterns, like in simulations. Quantum physics: The observer effect makes reality seem like it “renders” only when observed — like a video game. Error-correcting codes: Found in string theory equations — the same kind used in computer programs.

3. The Brain as a Machine

If consciousness results from information processing, then it could, in theory, be replicated or simulated in a powerful enough system.

What Does Religion Say?

Many ancient religions suggest that this life is not the true reality — a concept surprisingly similar to the Simulation Hypothesis.

Hinduism – maya (illusion): “The unreal has no being; the real never ceases to be.” — Bhagavad Gita 2:16 Buddhism – samsara (illusory cycles): “All conditioned things are like a dream, a phantom, a bubble.” — The Diamond Sutra Christianity – temporary physical realm: “For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” — 2 Corinthians 4:18 Islam – life as a test: “This worldly life is nothing but play and amusement…” — Qur’an 6:32

In this way, the Simulation Hypothesis can be seen as a technological reinterpretation of age-old spiritual insights — where “God” may be reimagined as the “Programmer.”

Why It Matters

Even without proof, the idea challenges how we understand:

Consciousness Ethics The nature of reality The possible existence of a higher order

Whether interpreted scientifically or spiritually, the question remains: What is real?

Final Thoughts

We may never know for sure if we’re in a simulation, but the implications are worth thinking about. Real or not, our experiences, relationships, and choices still matter.

Perhaps the real question isn’t “Are we in a simulation?”

But rather: “How should we live, even if we are?”